The case study that I put in the attachments also has more information that was not attached
in the attachment it ended with “would your” the following part that was not attached went on to say ” would your answer differ if the transaction were governed by GISG? [ Hunger United States Special Hydraulic Cylinders Corp. v. Hardie-Tynes Manufacturing Co., 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 165(10th Cir. 2000).]”
Grading Rubric for End of Chapter Case Analysis
|
Criterion |
Assessment Measure |
Points |
|
Case Facts |
Sufficient facts to analyze the legal question |
0 – 5 |
|
Legal Question |
As presented in case, or the legal issue from facts. |
0 – 5 |
|
Analysis & Supporting References |
Original student analysis supported by specific text and/or other references. |
0 – 5 |
|
Application |
How the student will broadly apply what is learned. |
0 – 5 |
|
Comments |
Value-added comments on cases of at least two other student case analyses. |
0 – 5
|
